EHLEN v. CARNAHAN, 12-3122-CV-S-FJG. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20120314a66
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER FERNANDO J. GAITAN, Jr., Chief District Judge. Pending before the Court is the State of Missouri's Motion for Leave to Intervene (Doc. No. 11), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1 and 24. While they indicate it is unclear whether the apportionment map at issue in this case qualifies as a "state statute" under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1, plaintiffs indicate they have no objection to the Attorney General's participation in this case. For good cause shown, the motion for leave to intervene (Doc. No.
Summary: ORDER FERNANDO J. GAITAN, Jr., Chief District Judge. Pending before the Court is the State of Missouri's Motion for Leave to Intervene (Doc. No. 11), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1 and 24. While they indicate it is unclear whether the apportionment map at issue in this case qualifies as a "state statute" under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1, plaintiffs indicate they have no objection to the Attorney General's participation in this case. For good cause shown, the motion for leave to intervene (Doc. No. 1..
More
ORDER
FERNANDO J. GAITAN, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the State of Missouri's Motion for Leave to Intervene (Doc. No. 11), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1 and 24. While they indicate it is unclear whether the apportionment map at issue in this case qualifies as a "state statute" under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1, plaintiffs indicate they have no objection to the Attorney General's participation in this case.
For good cause shown, the motion for leave to intervene (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED, and the State of Missouri by and through the Missouri Attorney General's Office shall be allowed to intervene.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
