U.S. v. WARD, 11-04048-01-CR-FJG. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20120515a54
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 14, 2012
Latest Update: May 14, 2012
Summary: ORDER FERNANDO J. GAITAN, Jr., District Judge. Pending before the Court is defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 16). On April 16, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth entered a Report and Recommendation which recommended denying defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 29). On April 30, 2012, defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32). The Court, after independent review of the record and applicable law, adopts and incorporates by referenc
Summary: ORDER FERNANDO J. GAITAN, Jr., District Judge. Pending before the Court is defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 16). On April 16, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth entered a Report and Recommendation which recommended denying defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 29). On April 30, 2012, defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32). The Court, after independent review of the record and applicable law, adopts and incorporates by reference..
More
ORDER
FERNANDO J. GAITAN, Jr., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 16).
On April 16, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth entered a Report and Recommendation which recommended denying defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 29). On April 30, 2012, defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32).
The Court, after independent review of the record and applicable law, adopts and incorporates by reference herein, the magistrate's findings and conclusions. Therefore, the Court finds that defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 16) will be DENIED.
Source: Leagle
