U.S. v. ACOSTA, 12-0010-CR-W-HFS. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20120516c14
Visitors: 25
Filed: May 15, 2012
Latest Update: May 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER HOWARD F. SACHS, District Judge. The defendants have filed motions to suppress (Docs. 32 and 39), which have been heard by Judge Hays. They object to her report and the recommendation that I deny the motions. Having reviewed the record and briefing I agree with the report and recommendation, which I adopt, and DENY the motions. Defendant Acosta objects principally to the vehicle stop and defendant Rodriguez objects principally to the basis for asserting suspicion justifying further det
Summary: ORDER HOWARD F. SACHS, District Judge. The defendants have filed motions to suppress (Docs. 32 and 39), which have been heard by Judge Hays. They object to her report and the recommendation that I deny the motions. Having reviewed the record and briefing I agree with the report and recommendation, which I adopt, and DENY the motions. Defendant Acosta objects principally to the vehicle stop and defendant Rodriguez objects principally to the basis for asserting suspicion justifying further dete..
More
ORDER
HOWARD F. SACHS, District Judge.
The defendants have filed motions to suppress (Docs. 32 and 39), which have been heard by Judge Hays. They object to her report and the recommendation that I deny the motions. Having reviewed the record and briefing I agree with the report and recommendation, which I adopt, and DENY the motions.
Defendant Acosta objects principally to the vehicle stop and defendant Rodriguez objects principally to the basis for asserting suspicion justifying further detention and questioning. The report and recommendation adequately deals with the issues raised by counsel and in my judgment requires no further discussion.
Source: Leagle
