Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 12-03067-01-CR-S-CDP. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri Number: infdco20130829a27 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY DAVID P. RUSH, Magistrate Judge. The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. 636, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One and admitted to the Forfeiture Allegation contained in the Indictment filed on August 28, 2012. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was kn
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

DAVID P. RUSH, Magistrate Judge.

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. § 636, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One and admitted to the Forfeiture Allegation contained in the Indictment filed on August 28, 2012. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by a factual basis for each of the essential elements of the offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer