U.S. v. ADAMS, 15-00153-01-CR-W-GAF. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20151014a39
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER GARY A. FENNER , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. 15). Defendant asserts that Section 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to him, impermissibly infringing on his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. On September 8, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18). On October 2, 2015, Defendant's Objections to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) were filed. Up
Summary: ORDER GARY A. FENNER , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. 15). Defendant asserts that Section 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to him, impermissibly infringing on his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. On September 8, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18). On October 2, 2015, Defendant's Objections to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) were filed. Upo..
More
ORDER
GARY A. FENNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. 15). Defendant asserts that Section 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to him, impermissibly infringing on his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
On September 8, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18). On October 2, 2015, Defendant's Objections to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) were filed.
Upon careful and independent review of the pending motion, defendant's objections to the Report and Recommendation, as well as the applicable law, this Court hereby adopts and incorporates as its own Opinion and Order the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion Dismiss Indictment (Doc. 15) is OVERRULED and DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
