Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. ASHTON, 14-05032-07-CR-SW-MDH. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri Number: infdco20151216c80 Visitors: 54
Filed: Nov. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 25, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY DAVID P. RUSH , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. 636, and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One and Two and admitted to Forfeiture Allegation Three contained in the Superseding Indictment filed on September 30, 2014. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determin
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. §636, and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One and Two and admitted to Forfeiture Allegation Three contained in the Superseding Indictment filed on September 30, 2014. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty pleas were knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offenses charged are supported by a factual basis for each of the essential elements of the offenses. I therefore recommend that the pleas of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within 14 days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer