Filed: Feb. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER ROSEANN A. KETCHMARK , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 21). Defendant asserts that any and all custodial statements allegedly made by him to law enforcement on October 24, 2011, should be suppressed. On December 3, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge David P. Rush conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress. On January 21, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Rush issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32
Summary: ORDER ROSEANN A. KETCHMARK , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 21). Defendant asserts that any and all custodial statements allegedly made by him to law enforcement on October 24, 2011, should be suppressed. On December 3, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge David P. Rush conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress. On January 21, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Rush issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32)..
More
ORDER
ROSEANN A. KETCHMARK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 21). Defendant asserts that any and all custodial statements allegedly made by him to law enforcement on October 24, 2011, should be suppressed. On December 3, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge David P. Rush conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress.
On January 21, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Rush issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32). On February 8, 2016, Defendant's Exceptions to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 33) was filed.
Upon careful and independent review of the pending motion, the government's response to motion to suppress (Doc. 24), defendant's objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, as well as the applicable law, this Court hereby adopts and incorporates as its own Opinion and Order the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David P. Rush.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 21) is OVERRULED and DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
