Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. DAVIS, 14-03106-11-CR-S-MDH. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri Number: infdco20161221e68 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2016
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY DAVID P. RUSH , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. 636, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One and admitted to the Forfeiture Allegation Six of the Second Superseding Indictment filed on July 22, 2015. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the gu
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. § 636, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One and admitted to the Forfeiture Allegation Six of the Second Superseding Indictment filed on July 22, 2015. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by a factual basis for each of the essential elements of the offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer