U.S. v. NIXON, 16-00150-12-CR-W-DGK. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20170831c93
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2017
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY SARAH W. HAYS , District Judge . The Defendant appeared before me pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, Local Rule 72.1(e)(27), and 28 U.S.C. 636 and entered a plea of guilty pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1)(B) to Counts One, Three and Four of the Superseding Indictment. The Defendant also admitted the allegations of forfeiture, which include a money judgment to be entered against the Defendant, as contained in the Superseding Indictment. I de
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY SARAH W. HAYS , District Judge . The Defendant appeared before me pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, Local Rule 72.1(e)(27), and 28 U.S.C. 636 and entered a plea of guilty pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1)(B) to Counts One, Three and Four of the Superseding Indictment. The Defendant also admitted the allegations of forfeiture, which include a money judgment to be entered against the Defendant, as contained in the Superseding Indictment. I det..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY
SARAH W. HAYS, District Judge.
The Defendant appeared before me pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, Local Rule 72.1(e)(27), and 28 U.S.C. § 636 and entered a plea of guilty pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1)(B) to Counts One, Three and Four of the Superseding Indictment. The Defendant also admitted the allegations of forfeiture, which include a money judgment to be entered against the Defendant, as contained in the Superseding Indictment. I determined that the guilty plea is knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offenses. A record was made of the proceedings and a transcript is available. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.
Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Source: Leagle
