U.S. v. Fry, 17-00235-01-CR-W-GAF. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20181026c83
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER GARY A. FENNER , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. #24). Defendant seeks to suppress all evidence and testimony procured through his warrantless seizure and detention on July 8, 2017, as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. On September 11, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress. On October 10, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays issued her
Summary: ORDER GARY A. FENNER , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. #24). Defendant seeks to suppress all evidence and testimony procured through his warrantless seizure and detention on July 8, 2017, as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. On September 11, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress. On October 10, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays issued her R..
More
ORDER
GARY A. FENNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. #24). Defendant seeks to suppress all evidence and testimony procured through his warrantless seizure and detention on July 8, 2017, as a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
On September 11, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress.
On October 10, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays issued her Report and Recommendation (Doc. #39). Objections were due October 24, 2018. No objections were filed.
Upon careful and independent review of the pending motion, as well as the applicable law, this Court hereby adopts and incorporates as its own Opinion and Order the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. #24) is OVERRULED and DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
