ORDER GRANTING COSTS

GREG KAYS, District Judge.

This lawsuit alleged the suspension of a high school student for physically threatening her soccer coach violated the student's constitutional rights. After Defendants removed the case to federal court, Plaintiffs dismissed with prejudice the sole count over which the Court possessed jurisidiction, and the Court remanded the case to state court.

Now before the Court is Defendants' Proposed Bill of Costs (Doc. 19), which consists of only the $400 filing fee. Plaintiffs have not filed any opposition to the proposed bill of costs.

Rule 54(d)(1) provides that "[u]nless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order provides otherwise, costs—other than attorney's fees—should be allowed to the prevailing party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1). A district court "has discretion in determining and awarding costs in a given case," Pershern v. Fiatallis N. Am., Inc., 834 F.2d 136, 140 (8th Cir. 1987), but the prevailing party "is presumptively entitled to recover all of its costs." Thompson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 472 F.3d 515, 517 (8th Cir. 2006). Of course, the prevailing party bears the burden of persuading the court that the items and amounts sought are compensable under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 or some other authority. Combs v. Cordish Cos., No. 14-0227-CV-ODS, 2015 WL 5096009, at *1 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 28, 2015).

Section 1920 specifies that the judge may tax as costs fees of the clerk, which is what the $400 filing fee is, and so the requested amount is compensable. 28 U.S.C. § 1920(1). The Court also sees no reason why the presumption in favor of awarding Defendants all costs to which they are entitled should not apply in this case. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED.

Costs of $400 are awarded to Defendants against Plaintiffs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.