United States v. Sparks, 4:18-CR-00293-DGK-02. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20200128c54
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2020
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT THREE OF SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GREG KAYS , District Judge . Before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 166), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Second Superseding Indictment (Doc. 167), and United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 236). The Court has read the Government's responses to Defendan
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT THREE OF SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GREG KAYS , District Judge . Before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 166), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Second Superseding Indictment (Doc. 167), and United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 236). The Court has read the Government's responses to Defendant..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT THREE OF SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT
GREG KAYS, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 166), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Second Superseding Indictment (Doc. 167), and United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 236). The Court has read the Government's responses to Defendant's motions (Docs. 186, 188), Defendant's replies (Docs. 189, 190), and Defendant's Objections to Judge Maughmer's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 237). The Court has also reviewed the transcript from the evidentiary hearing held on September 18, 2019, (Doc. 210) and the admitted exhibits.
After carefully reviewing Judge Maughmer's report and conducting an independent review of the record and applicable law, see L.R. 74.1(a), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 236). The Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 166) and his Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Second Superseding Indictment (Doc. 167).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
