CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. v. MISSISSIPPI RICE AND GRAIN II, LLC, 4:11-cv-109-SA-JMV. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20120713865
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER JANE M. VIRDEN, Magistrate Judge. This cause is before the court on the defendant's motions to strike plaintiff's designation of experts and supplemental designation (#32 and #40). The court, having reviewed the record, the motion, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and having heard oral argument, finds as follows: For the reasons announced in detail by the court on the record at the conclusion of the motion hearing on July 12, 2012, the court finds that the first motio
Summary: ORDER JANE M. VIRDEN, Magistrate Judge. This cause is before the court on the defendant's motions to strike plaintiff's designation of experts and supplemental designation (#32 and #40). The court, having reviewed the record, the motion, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and having heard oral argument, finds as follows: For the reasons announced in detail by the court on the record at the conclusion of the motion hearing on July 12, 2012, the court finds that the first motion..
More
ORDER
JANE M. VIRDEN, Magistrate Judge.
This cause is before the court on the defendant's motions to strike plaintiff's designation of experts and supplemental designation (#32 and #40). The court, having reviewed the record, the motion, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and having heard oral argument, finds as follows:
For the reasons announced in detail by the court on the record at the conclusion of the motion hearing on July 12, 2012, the court finds that the first motion is denied for failure to contain a good faith certificate and the second motion is denied for that reason and the further reason that it constitutes a sufficient disclosure under the FRCP 26(a)(2)(C). Accordingly, the motions are not well taken, and shall be DENIED. Parties are to bear their own costs.
Additionally, in light of today's ruling, the court finds it necessary to move current case management order deadlines as follows:
• Defendant's designation of experts: September 13, 2012
• Discovery deadline: October 30, 2012
• Dispositive motions deadline: November 13, 2012
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
