WHITEHEAD v. MESILLA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION, 2:06CV106-B-A. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20140424a81
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NEAL B. BIGGERS, Jr., District Judge. Presently before the court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge dated October 4, 2013. The plaintiff has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the defendant has responded. The court finds that the plaintiff has made no specific objection to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation and has cited no authority in support of his position. For the most part, the plaintiff simply
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NEAL B. BIGGERS, Jr., District Judge. Presently before the court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge dated October 4, 2013. The plaintiff has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the defendant has responded. The court finds that the plaintiff has made no specific objection to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation and has cited no authority in support of his position. For the most part, the plaintiff simply ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
NEAL B. BIGGERS, Jr., District Judge.
Presently before the court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge dated October 4, 2013. The plaintiff has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the defendant has responded.
The court finds that the plaintiff has made no specific objection to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation and has cited no authority in support of his position. For the most part, the plaintiff simply expresses general dissatisfaction with his attorney. The plaintiff's objection therefore does not comport with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2) and is without merit.
It is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated October 4, 2013, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court, and the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law therein set out are adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court.
Source: Leagle
