BARNES v. JOHN M. O'QUINN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, 4:16-CV-72-SA-JMV. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20170403e77
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: ORDER SHARION AYCOCK , District Judge . Now before the Court is the Plaintiffs' Motion and Notice [45] of voluntary dismissal of all their claims against Defendant Joe Gibson without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Defendant Gibson does not oppose the Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss him. With the procedural prerequisites of Rule 41 met, the Court finds the Plaintiffs' motion well taken and it is GRANTED. Defendant Gibson's separate Motion to Dismiss [32] is the
Summary: ORDER SHARION AYCOCK , District Judge . Now before the Court is the Plaintiffs' Motion and Notice [45] of voluntary dismissal of all their claims against Defendant Joe Gibson without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Defendant Gibson does not oppose the Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss him. With the procedural prerequisites of Rule 41 met, the Court finds the Plaintiffs' motion well taken and it is GRANTED. Defendant Gibson's separate Motion to Dismiss [32] is ther..
More
ORDER
SHARION AYCOCK, District Judge.
Now before the Court is the Plaintiffs' Motion and Notice [45] of voluntary dismissal of all their claims against Defendant Joe Gibson without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Defendant Gibson does not oppose the Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss him. With the procedural prerequisites of Rule 41 met, the Court finds the Plaintiffs' motion well taken and it is GRANTED. Defendant Gibson's separate Motion to Dismiss [32] is therefore MOOT. Defendant Gibson is DISMISSED from this case without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
