Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RONALDO DESIGNER JEWELRY, INC. v. COX, 1:17-CV-2-DMB-DAS. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20170501m24 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER DEBRA M. BROWN , District Judge . On April 27, 2017, the Court, pursuant to notice, convened a telephonic conference with the parties to discuss, among other things, the status of various pending motions. During the conference, the parties advised and agreed that, should the Court grant the plaintiff's April 24, 2017, unopposed motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, Doc. #75, with the defendants having the opportunity to respond to such second amended complaint once fil
More

ORDER

On April 27, 2017, the Court, pursuant to notice, convened a telephonic conference with the parties to discuss, among other things, the status of various pending motions. During the conference, the parties advised and agreed that, should the Court grant the plaintiff's April 24, 2017, unopposed motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, Doc. #75, with the defendants having the opportunity to respond to such second amended complaint once filed in the normal course, the following motions should be denied as moot: (1) the plaintiff's April 6, 2017, motion for leave to file a second amended complaint,1 Doc. #63; (2) the defendants' motions to dismiss, Doc. #25, Doc. #27; (3) the defendants' amended motion to dismiss, Doc. #48; (4) the defendants' motion for leave to file a second amended motion to dismiss, Doc. #53; and (5) the defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint, Doc. #60. Based on the parties' agreements, it is ORDERED:

1. The plaintiff's April 24, 2017, unopposed motion for leave to file a second amended complaint [75] is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall file the second amended complaint attached to the motion no later than May 1, 2017.

2. The plaintiff's April 6, 2017, motion for leave to file a second amended complaint [63] is DENIED as moot.

3. The defendants' motions to dismiss [25][27] are DENIED as moot.

4. The defendants' amended motion to dismiss [48] is DENIED as moot.

5. The defendants' motion for leave to file a second amended motion to dismiss [53] is DENIED as moot.

6. The defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint [60] is DENIED as moot.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. This motion was withdrawn on April 24, 2017, by the plaintiff filing of a "Notice of Withdrawal of Pending Opposed Motion for Leave o File Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc." Doc. #74.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer