Lee v. M.C.C.V./M.T.C., 3:16CV218-MPM-DAS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20180228e40
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT MICHAEL P. MILLS , District Judge . Having considered the file and records in this action, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was duly served by mail upon the pro se plaintiff at his last known address; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation; and that no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommend
Summary: JUDGMENT MICHAEL P. MILLS , District Judge . Having considered the file and records in this action, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was duly served by mail upon the pro se plaintiff at his last known address; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation; and that no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommenda..
More
JUDGMENT
MICHAEL P. MILLS, District Judge.
Having considered the file and records in this action, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was duly served by mail upon the pro se plaintiff at his last known address; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation; and that no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation should therefore be approved and adopted as the opinion of the court. It is ordered:
1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the court.
2. That this case will PROCEED as to the plaintiff's claim against defendant Bernice Brown for denial of access to the courts.
3. That the plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
