Draper v. MDOC-Parchman Facility, 4:16-CV-190-DMB-RP. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20180307d18
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL DEBRA M. BROWN , District Judge . On February 16, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because of Draper's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the Court requiring him to keep the Court informed of his current address. Doc. #38. In light of such, the Report and Recommendation also recommends that the pe
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL DEBRA M. BROWN , District Judge . On February 16, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because of Draper's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the Court requiring him to keep the Court informed of his current address. Doc. #38. In light of such, the Report and Recommendation also recommends that the pen..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
DEBRA M. BROWN, District Judge.
On February 16, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because of Draper's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the Court requiring him to keep the Court informed of his current address. Doc. #38. In light of such, the Report and Recommendation also recommends that the pending motions in this case be dismissed as moot. Id.
On February 16, 2018, the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Draper at his last known address but was returned as undeliverable on March 5, 2018.1 Doc. #39. Considering such, the Court concludes that this case should be dismissed because of Draper's failure to prosecute and failure to keep the Court informed of his current address. Therefore:
1. The Report and Recommendation [38] is ADOPTED as the order of the Court.
2. The pending August 8, 2017, Report and Recommendation [19] is REJECTED as moot.
3. The pending motions [25][27] are DENIED as moot.
4. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
5. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case on the Court's docket.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court's orders of September 26, 2017, and October 4, 2017, were also returned as undeliverable. See Doc. #32; Doc. #35.
Source: Leagle
