Filed: Apr. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2018
Summary: AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE SHARION AYCOCK , District Judge . THIS CAUSE having come on for consideration on the ore tenus motion of Plaintiff, Mary J. Winter, through her attorney, for entry of a judgment dismissing this cause with prejudice on the basis that all claims have been fully resolved and compromised, and the Court, understanding that counsel for Defendants; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart #112, both improperly named as parties, and the proper Wal-Mart entity
Summary: AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE SHARION AYCOCK , District Judge . THIS CAUSE having come on for consideration on the ore tenus motion of Plaintiff, Mary J. Winter, through her attorney, for entry of a judgment dismissing this cause with prejudice on the basis that all claims have been fully resolved and compromised, and the Court, understanding that counsel for Defendants; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart #112, both improperly named as parties, and the proper Wal-Mart entity,..
More
AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
SHARION AYCOCK, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE having come on for consideration on the ore tenus motion of Plaintiff, Mary J. Winter, through her attorney, for entry of a judgment dismissing this cause with prejudice on the basis that all claims have been fully resolved and compromised, and the Court, understanding that counsel for Defendants; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart #112, both improperly named as parties, and the proper Wal-Mart entity, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP; joins this motion, finds that the requested relief is well founded and should be and hereby is GRANTED.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the above-styled and numbered cause be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice.
