Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Spencer v. Intellifarms, LLC, 4:18CV0092-SA-JMV. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20180606c68 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . This case comes before the Court pursuant to L.U.CIV.R. 16(b)(1)(B). The rule provides that [a] motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand. . . issue and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the [remand] motion[]. . . . The parties filed a joint motion to remand [13] on June 4, 2018. Acc
More

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS

This case comes before the Court pursuant to L.U.CIV.R. 16(b)(1)(B). The rule provides that

[a] motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand. . . issue and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the [remand] motion[]. . . .

The parties filed a joint motion to remand [13] on June 4, 2018. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

That the proceedings enumerated in Local Rule 16(b)(1)(B) are hereby STAYED pending a decision on the motion to remand. The parties shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of the Court's ruling in the event the motion to remand is denied.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer