Ceres Consulting, L.L.C. v. Burkhalter Rigging, Inc., 1:18-cv-037-GHD-DAS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20180803a06
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2018
Summary: AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE GLEN H. DAVIDSON , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss the above styled and numbered action. The Court, being informed that the parties have reached a settlement, as confirmed by a Settlement Agreement fully executed by authorized representatives of both parties, and being further informed that the parties have requested the Court to retain jurisdiction of this matter following entry of this Order
Summary: AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE GLEN H. DAVIDSON , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss the above styled and numbered action. The Court, being informed that the parties have reached a settlement, as confirmed by a Settlement Agreement fully executed by authorized representatives of both parties, and being further informed that the parties have requested the Court to retain jurisdiction of this matter following entry of this Order ..
More
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
GLEN H. DAVIDSON, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss the above styled and numbered action. The Court, being informed that the parties have reached a settlement, as confirmed by a Settlement Agreement fully executed by authorized representatives of both parties, and being further informed that the parties have requested the Court to retain jurisdiction of this matter following entry of this Order for purposes of enforcing the settlement, as necessary, hereby finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs Complaint against Burkhalter Rigging, Inc. be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorney's fees, expenses and costs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Court hereby retains jurisdiction over this action following entry of this Order for the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreed to by both parties, as necessary.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
