Kimble v. Gammill, 3:17CV201-RP. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20180808b04
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROY PERCY , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are three motions filed by the plaintiff, Tyrowone Kimble: (1) a motion for all medical documents he submitted as exhibits to his previously-filed motions for summary judgment at Doc. #59 and Doc. #81; (2) a motion to preclude the defendants from calling witnesses at trial due to their failure to timely file a witness list; and (3) a "Motion for Information" in which the plaintiff advises the Court that he may not be receiving a
Summary: ORDER ROY PERCY , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are three motions filed by the plaintiff, Tyrowone Kimble: (1) a motion for all medical documents he submitted as exhibits to his previously-filed motions for summary judgment at Doc. #59 and Doc. #81; (2) a motion to preclude the defendants from calling witnesses at trial due to their failure to timely file a witness list; and (3) a "Motion for Information" in which the plaintiff advises the Court that he may not be receiving al..
More
ORDER
ROY PERCY, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court are three motions filed by the plaintiff, Tyrowone Kimble: (1) a motion for all medical documents he submitted as exhibits to his previously-filed motions for summary judgment at Doc. #59 and Doc. #81; (2) a motion to preclude the defendants from calling witnesses at trial due to their failure to timely file a witness list; and (3) a "Motion for Information" in which the plaintiff advises the Court that he may not be receiving all of his mail. Having fully considered these matters, it is ORDERED:
That the plaintiff's motion for documents [128] is DENIED, as the plaintiff should have retained a copy for his records prior to submitting them, and the Court will not order their reproduction at government expense. Therefore, if plaintiff desires copies of documents he has filed with the Court, he may request copies from the Clerk's Office and remit a fee of $.50 per page for said copies.
That the plaintiff's motion to preclude the defendants from calling witnesses at trial [129] is DENIED, as the defendants did, in fact, timely file a witness and exhibit list on March 5, 2018. See Doc. #87.
That the plaintiff's "Motion of Information" [130] is DISMISSED AS MOOT, as the motion contains no request for relief.
Source: Leagle
