Martin v. Thomas, 3:18CV253-NBB-JMV. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20181218803
Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "[a] motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand . . . and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion . . ." L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A joint motion to remand [12] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings
Summary: ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "[a] motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand . . . and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion . . ." L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A joint motion to remand [12] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings i..
More
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
JANE M. VIRDEN, Magistrate Judge.
Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "[a] motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand . . . and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion . . ." L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A joint motion to remand [12] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings is appropriate.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby STAYED and the [8] case management conferenced will be cancelled, pending a ruling on the motion to remand.
Should the parties desire to undertake remand related discovery they should first contact the court for scheduling of same so within seven (7) days hereof, setting forth the type and scope of such discovery and an estimated time frame for constructing it. If any party objects to the motion for discovery, it shall file its objection within four (4) days following service of the motion for immunity-related discovery. Defendants shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the motion to remand and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay.
SO ORDERED
Source: Leagle
