Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Yalobusha County v. Enpro Industries, Inc., 3:19-cv-43-GHD-JMV. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20190412563 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "[a] motion to remand... will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand ... and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion..." L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A motion to remand [15] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings is appropriate.
More

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS

Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "[a] motion to remand... will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand... and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion..." L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A motion to remand [15] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings is appropriate.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby STAYED and the [8] case management conference will be cancelled pending a ruling on the motion to remand. The parties must promptly notify the magistrate judge of any order denying a motion to remand and must promptly submit a proposed order lifting the stay.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer