Azlin v. Azlin Planting Co., 4:19cv149-MPM-JMV. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20191105608
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "A motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand . . . and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion . . ." L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A motion to remand [15] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings is appropr
Summary: ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "A motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand . . . and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion . . ." L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A motion to remand [15] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings is appropri..
More
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
JANE M. VIRDEN, Magistrate Judge.
Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "A motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand . . . and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion . . ." L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A motion to remand [15] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings is appropriate at this time.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby STAYED, pending a ruling on the motion to remand. The parties must promptly notify the magistrate judge of any order denying the motion to remand and must, thereafter, promptly submit a proposed order lifting the stay.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
