Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BRUNELLE v. ASTRUE, 4:11-CV-00032-DPJ-FKB. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20120217988 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER DANIEL P. JORDAN, III, District Judge. This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. The deadline to object under Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has now passed without objection. The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds
More

ORDER

DANIEL P. JORDAN, III, District Judge.

This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. The deadline to object under Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has now passed without objection. The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court.

A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with the Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer