RASHAD v. MOSELY, 3:13-cv-852-DCB-MTP. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20141223d46
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge. This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation [docket entry 17] of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court, and there being no objections thereto, and the Court, having fully reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion o
Summary: ORDER DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge. This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation [docket entry 17] of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court, and there being no objections thereto, and the Court, having fully reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of..
More
ORDER
DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge.
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation [docket entry 17] of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court, and there being no objections thereto, and the Court, having fully reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court, and that Petitioner's Amended Petition [3] for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2241, his Motion [11] to stay proceedings, and his Motion [15] to Respond, are DENIED and this case is dismissed with prejudice.
A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with this Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
