TAYLOR v. BANKS, 3:11CV650TSL-JCG. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20150508d03
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 07, 2015
Latest Update: May 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER TOM S. LEE , District Judge . This cause is before the court on the February 10, 2015 report and recommendation (docket number 107) entered by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo recommending that plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. Plaintiff Charlie Lee Taylor has filed his objections. Having considered the report and recommendations, plaintiff's objections and the record in this case, the court concludes that the report and recommendation is well taken and shoul
Summary: ORDER TOM S. LEE , District Judge . This cause is before the court on the February 10, 2015 report and recommendation (docket number 107) entered by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo recommending that plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. Plaintiff Charlie Lee Taylor has filed his objections. Having considered the report and recommendations, plaintiff's objections and the record in this case, the court concludes that the report and recommendation is well taken and should..
More
ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the February 10, 2015 report and recommendation (docket number 107) entered by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo recommending that plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. Plaintiff Charlie Lee Taylor has filed his objections. Having considered the report and recommendations, plaintiff's objections and the record in this case, the court concludes that the report and recommendation is well taken and should be adopted.
Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate John C. Gargiulo entered on February 10, 2015, be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this court to the extent as set forth above. Accordingly, it is further ordered that plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. It is further ordered that plaintiff's motion for production of documents, whereby he appears to seek a copy of his objections to the report and recommendation is denied.
Source: Leagle
