Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SIZOR v. STANDARD MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 1:15MC425-LG-RHW. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20160607c42 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE LOUIS GUIROLA, Jr. , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte. The plaintiff Gilda Y. Sizor initiated this lawsuit by filing an Affidavit of Fraud and False Statements [1]. She asked the Clerk of Court to file her affidavit as a miscellaneous filing, and she submitted a filing fee of $46.00. The Court has reviewed Sizor's Affidavit, and it appears that she is seeking relief pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 7206, which provides crimin
More

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte. The plaintiff Gilda Y. Sizor initiated this lawsuit by filing an Affidavit of Fraud and False Statements [1]. She asked the Clerk of Court to file her affidavit as a miscellaneous filing, and she submitted a filing fee of $46.00. The Court has reviewed Sizor's Affidavit, and it appears that she is seeking relief pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7206, which provides criminal penalties for fraud and false statements.1

This Court does not have authority to initiate criminal prosecutions. That authority is vested with the Executive Branch of the United States Government. Therefore, if Sizor wishes for criminal charges to be filed against the defendants, she should contact the U.S. Department of Justice or the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi.

However, if Sizor is seeking monetary damages or injunctive relief she must (1) file a complaint and (2) either pay the civil filing fee of $400.00 or file a motion for permission to proceed in forma pauperis.

Since this Court cannot award the relief that is requested in Sizor's Affidavit, this case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all pending motions are MOOT.

FootNotes


1. Sizor actually cited 26 U.S.C. 7296, but no such statute exists.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer