Jones v. Singing River Health Services Foundation, 1:14cv447 LG-RHW (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20160613755
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION LOUIS GUIROLA, Jr. , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the Stipulation Regarding Class Membership of Jessie Carl Beasley, Sr., et al. and Joint Request for Entry of Order Regarding Same. This Court finds that undersigned Counsel for Jones' Plaintiffs and Counsel for the Beasleys, among others, have reached said Stipulation. Therefore, the Court FINDS, ORDERS and ADJUDGES: The Beasleys are not members of the proposed Class, were never contemplated to be
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION LOUIS GUIROLA, Jr. , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the Stipulation Regarding Class Membership of Jessie Carl Beasley, Sr., et al. and Joint Request for Entry of Order Regarding Same. This Court finds that undersigned Counsel for Jones' Plaintiffs and Counsel for the Beasleys, among others, have reached said Stipulation. Therefore, the Court FINDS, ORDERS and ADJUDGES: The Beasleys are not members of the proposed Class, were never contemplated to be ..
More
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION
LOUIS GUIROLA, Jr., District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the Stipulation Regarding Class Membership of Jessie Carl Beasley, Sr., et al. and Joint Request for Entry of Order Regarding Same. This Court finds that undersigned Counsel for Jones' Plaintiffs and Counsel for the Beasleys, among others, have reached said Stipulation. Therefore, the Court FINDS, ORDERS and ADJUDGES:
The Beasleys are not members of the proposed Class, were never contemplated to be members of the Class or subject to the Settlement, are not affected by the proposed Class or Settlement, and the Beasleys are free to proceed unimpeded with their case in their prior-filed Case No. 2014-0230-WHM filed in The Chancery Court of George County, MS, with the understanding that the Class and the Settlement will in no way affect the Beasleys rights and claims and the Beasleys are therefore not bound by the proposed Class and any proposed Settlement. Upon entry of said Stipulation and this Order, the Beasleys will withdraw both their objection and their memorandum in support (Doc. Nos. 174 and 175). The Court certifies this Order as a final judgment.
SO ORDERED and ADJUDGED.
Source: Leagle
