Filed: Aug. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER KEITH STARRETT , District Judge . On August 18, 2017, Defendants ("Movants") filed their Motion to Dismiss [50]. Plaintiffs ("Respondents") have until on or before September 1, 2017, to respond to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wish to file a rebuttal, he may do so on or before September 8, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If either Movants or Respondents require an extension of time, they must file a motion for such pri
Summary: ORDER KEITH STARRETT , District Judge . On August 18, 2017, Defendants ("Movants") filed their Motion to Dismiss [50]. Plaintiffs ("Respondents") have until on or before September 1, 2017, to respond to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wish to file a rebuttal, he may do so on or before September 8, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If either Movants or Respondents require an extension of time, they must file a motion for such prio..
More
ORDER
KEITH STARRETT, District Judge.
On August 18, 2017, Defendants ("Movants") filed their Motion to Dismiss [50]. Plaintiffs ("Respondents") have until on or before September 1, 2017, to respond to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wish to file a rebuttal, he may do so on or before September 8, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4).
If either Movants or Respondents require an extension of time, they must file a motion for such prior to the deadline's expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).
Movants' original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five (35) pages, and Respondents' response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5). If a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
