Watson v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 3:16-cv-987-CWR-FKB. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20180116b24
Filed: Jan. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REQUEST OF DETERMINATION OF PRIVILEGE F. KEITH BALL , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Request for Determination of Privilege [64], and Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal [65]. Watson requests that the Court determine whether forty-one pages, which Defendant claims were inadvertently disclosed, are privileged. [64]. Plaintiff's motion is little more than a page in length and unaccompanied by a mem
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REQUEST OF DETERMINATION OF PRIVILEGE F. KEITH BALL , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Request for Determination of Privilege [64], and Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal [65]. Watson requests that the Court determine whether forty-one pages, which Defendant claims were inadvertently disclosed, are privileged. [64]. Plaintiff's motion is little more than a page in length and unaccompanied by a memo..
More
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REQUEST OF DETERMINATION OF PRIVILEGE
F. KEITH BALL, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Request for Determination of Privilege [64], and Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal [65]. Watson requests that the Court determine whether forty-one pages, which Defendant claims were inadvertently disclosed, are privileged. [64]. Plaintiff's motion is little more than a page in length and unaccompanied by a memorandum of legal authorities, as required by L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Consequently, the Court is without sufficient information to rule on Plaintiff's motion. Further, Plaintiff did not request a Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3)(v) conference with the undersigned to address this issue prior to filing the instant motion, as required by section 6(F)(4) of the Case Management Order. See [17] at 3. For these reasons, motion [64] is denied without prejudice.
In motion [65], Plaintiff seeks leave to submit under seal the forty-one pages of documents at issue in motion [64]. This motion is also unaccompanied by a supporting memorandum, as required by L.U.Civ.R. 79(e)(3). For this reason, and in light of motion [64] being denied without prejudice, motion [65] is also denied without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
