Smith v. Mississippi Prison Industries Corporation, 3:17-cv-732-DPJ-FKB. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20180627b48
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER F. KEITH BALL , Magistrate Judge . This cause is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave from the Requirements of Local Uniform Civil Rule 83.1(d)(3) [25]. The unopposed motion requests that non-resident counsel be allowed to appear without resident counsel's appearance at depositions. Having considered the motion, the Court denies the requested relief. However, while resident counsel must attend each deposition in this case, per L.U.Civ.R. 83.1(b)(1) and 83.1(d)(3)
Summary: ORDER F. KEITH BALL , Magistrate Judge . This cause is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave from the Requirements of Local Uniform Civil Rule 83.1(d)(3) [25]. The unopposed motion requests that non-resident counsel be allowed to appear without resident counsel's appearance at depositions. Having considered the motion, the Court denies the requested relief. However, while resident counsel must attend each deposition in this case, per L.U.Civ.R. 83.1(b)(1) and 83.1(d)(3),..
More
ORDER
F. KEITH BALL, Magistrate Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave from the Requirements of Local Uniform Civil Rule 83.1(d)(3) [25]. The unopposed motion requests that non-resident counsel be allowed to appear without resident counsel's appearance at depositions. Having considered the motion, the Court denies the requested relief. However, while resident counsel must attend each deposition in this case, per L.U.Civ.R. 83.1(b)(1) and 83.1(d)(3), the Court finds that resident counsel may appear by telephone.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
