Cole v. Hall, 3:18-CV-770-CWR-MTP. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20190716c56
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES , District Judge . Before the Court is petitioner Joe Earl Cole's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R). See Docket Nos. 90-91. Cole argues that the Court should generally refer back to his prior motions and grant him relief, but he presents no specific reason or explanation for how the R&R erred. On review, however, the R&R appears to be correct that this federal habeas petition was untimely. Accordingly, the R&R is adopted as this
Summary: ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES , District Judge . Before the Court is petitioner Joe Earl Cole's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R). See Docket Nos. 90-91. Cole argues that the Court should generally refer back to his prior motions and grant him relief, but he presents no specific reason or explanation for how the R&R erred. On review, however, the R&R appears to be correct that this federal habeas petition was untimely. Accordingly, the R&R is adopted as this C..
More
ORDER
CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge.
Before the Court is petitioner Joe Earl Cole's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R). See Docket Nos. 90-91. Cole argues that the Court should generally refer back to his prior motions and grant him relief, but he presents no specific reason or explanation for how the R&R erred. On review, however, the R&R appears to be correct that this federal habeas petition was untimely.
Accordingly, the R&R is adopted as this Court's own Order, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. A separate Final Judgment shall issue. No certificate of appealability will be granted.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle