Mills v. Patten, 5:18-cv-24-KS-MTP. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20191002m21
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER KEITH STARRETT , District Judge . This cause came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [45] entered in this matter on July 17, 2019 regarding Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [40]. Having fully reviewed the same, as well as having reviewed Plaintiff's objections [50], 1 and otherwise being duly advised in the premises, this Court finds that said Report and Recommendation [45] should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
Summary: ORDER KEITH STARRETT , District Judge . This cause came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [45] entered in this matter on July 17, 2019 regarding Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [40]. Having fully reviewed the same, as well as having reviewed Plaintiff's objections [50], 1 and otherwise being duly advised in the premises, this Court finds that said Report and Recommendation [45] should be adopted as the opinion of this Court. ..
More
ORDER
KEITH STARRETT, District Judge.
This cause came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [45] entered in this matter on July 17, 2019 regarding Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [40]. Having fully reviewed the same, as well as having reviewed Plaintiff's objections [50],1 and otherwise being duly advised in the premises, this Court finds that said Report and Recommendation [45] should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the finding of this Court, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [40] is hereby granted. A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with this Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
FootNotes
1. The Plaintiff did not respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment, and his Objections to the Report and Recommendation were merely an attempt to rehash the facts of the case and belatedly submit evidence.
Source: Leagle
