Chunn v. Commissioner of US Social Security Administration, 3:18CV720TSL-MTP. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20200318b95
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER TOM S. LEE , District Judge . This cause is before the court on the objections of plaintiff Donnie Chunn to the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker, recommending that the Commissioner's motion to affirm be granted and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied. Having considered the objections, the court concludes that they are not well taken and will be overruled. The court further concludes that the report and recommendation sho
Summary: ORDER TOM S. LEE , District Judge . This cause is before the court on the objections of plaintiff Donnie Chunn to the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker, recommending that the Commissioner's motion to affirm be granted and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied. Having considered the objections, the court concludes that they are not well taken and will be overruled. The court further concludes that the report and recommendation shou..
More
ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the objections of plaintiff Donnie Chunn to the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker, recommending that the Commissioner's motion to affirm be granted and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied. Having considered the objections, the court concludes that they are not well taken and will be overruled. The court further concludes that the report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of the court.
It is ordered that plaintiff's objections are overruled. It is further ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the findings of the court. It follows then that the government's motion to affirm is granted, such that the action will be dismissed with prejudice, and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
