U.S. v. KAMATH, CR 14-27-BU-DLC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20151021967
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . The United States has moved to dismiss Count One of the Superseding Indictment as to defendant Ram Kamath without prejudice because the defendant, who does not oppose the motion, has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the United States. For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Count One of the Superseding Indictment is dismissed as to defendant Ram Kamath without p
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . The United States has moved to dismiss Count One of the Superseding Indictment as to defendant Ram Kamath without prejudice because the defendant, who does not oppose the motion, has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the United States. For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Count One of the Superseding Indictment is dismissed as to defendant Ram Kamath without pr..
More
ORDER
DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, Chief District Judge.
The United States has moved to dismiss Count One of the Superseding Indictment as to defendant Ram Kamath without prejudice because the defendant, who does not oppose the motion, has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the United States.
For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Count One of the Superseding Indictment is dismissed as to defendant Ram Kamath without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
