GOLIE v. MALCOMB, CV 14-10-H-DLC-JTJ. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20151218c97
Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered an order, findings, and recommendations in this case on October 5, 2015, denying Plaintiff Andrew David Golie's ("Golie") motions for appointment of counsel and extension of the discovery deadline, and recommending denial of his motion for temporary injunction and motion to add claims. Golie did not object to the order or to the findings and recommendations, and so waived the right to
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered an order, findings, and recommendations in this case on October 5, 2015, denying Plaintiff Andrew David Golie's ("Golie") motions for appointment of counsel and extension of the discovery deadline, and recommending denial of his motion for temporary injunction and motion to add claims. Golie did not object to the order or to the findings and recommendations, and so waived the right to ..
More
ORDER
DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, Chief District Judge.
United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered an order, findings, and recommendations in this case on October 5, 2015, denying Plaintiff Andrew David Golie's ("Golie") motions for appointment of counsel and extension of the discovery deadline, and recommending denial of his motion for temporary injunction and motion to add claims. Golie did not object to the order or to the findings and recommendations, and so waived the right to de nova review of the latter. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists ifthe Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted).
Having reviewed the findings and recommendations, the Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston's conclusions that Golie's motion for injunction relates to issues beyond this matter, and that Golie's motion to amend is both untimely and noncompliant with local and federal rules.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston's findings and recommendations (Doc. 27) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Golie's motion for temporary injunction and motion to add claims (Doc. 25) are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
