HOSKIN v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC, CV 15-62-M-DLC. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20160426b75
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Carrie Hoskin ("Hoskin") filed a motion for partial summary judgment on April 22, 2016. The Court's scheduling order, entered October 2, 2015, set a fully-briefed motions deadline of April 22, 2016. Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1)(B)(i) provides a non-movant twenty-one days to respond to a motion for summary judgment, meaning that in order to comply with the rule and the scheduling order, Hoskin should have filed her motion for partial
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Carrie Hoskin ("Hoskin") filed a motion for partial summary judgment on April 22, 2016. The Court's scheduling order, entered October 2, 2015, set a fully-briefed motions deadline of April 22, 2016. Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1)(B)(i) provides a non-movant twenty-one days to respond to a motion for summary judgment, meaning that in order to comply with the rule and the scheduling order, Hoskin should have filed her motion for partial ..
More
ORDER
DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff Carrie Hoskin ("Hoskin") filed a motion for partial summary judgment on April 22, 2016. The Court's scheduling order, entered October 2, 2015, set a fully-briefed motions deadline of April 22, 2016. Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1)(B)(i) provides a non-movant twenty-one days to respond to a motion for summary judgment, meaning that in order to comply with the rule and the scheduling order, Hoskin should have filed her motion for partial summary judgment no later than April 1, 2016. Hoskin's motion is therefore untimely.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Hoskin's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 13) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
