JAEGER v. POWELL, CV 16-30-BU-SEH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20161024a03
Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER SAM E. HADDON , District Judge . A proposed Agreed Protective Order the Court is requested to enter has been filed. 1 Counsel are apprised the Court is not disposed to approval of any requested protective order that is inconsistent with and that does not include, in substance, the following language: "Filing of documents under seal shall be conducted in compliance with L.R. 5.1 (d). No document filed under seal shall be considered by the Court or relied upon by any party absent an
Summary: ORDER SAM E. HADDON , District Judge . A proposed Agreed Protective Order the Court is requested to enter has been filed. 1 Counsel are apprised the Court is not disposed to approval of any requested protective order that is inconsistent with and that does not include, in substance, the following language: "Filing of documents under seal shall be conducted in compliance with L.R. 5.1 (d). No document filed under seal shall be considered by the Court or relied upon by any party absent an o..
More
ORDER
SAM E. HADDON, District Judge.
A proposed Agreed Protective Order the Court is requested to enter has been filed.1
Counsel are apprised the Court is not disposed to approval of any requested protective order that is inconsistent with and that does not include, in substance, the following language:
"Filing of documents under seal shall be conducted in compliance with L.R. 5.1 (d). No document filed under seal shall be considered by the Court or relied upon by any party absent an order of Court so permitting."
"All parties understand that all documents relied upon by the Court in resolving any issue before the Court, including documents filed under seal, will be made public contemporaneously with the Court's ruling on the issue."
The parties are invited to consider resubmission of the proposed order.
FootNotes
1. Doc. 59.
Source: Leagle
