Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FLAGSTONE DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. JOYNER, CV-08-100-BLG-SEH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20170504899 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2017
Summary: FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER SAM E. HADDON , District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. Civ. P. 16 and L.R. 16.4, the parties hereby submit this Final Pretrial Order: I. Nature of the Action Plaintiff Flagstone Development ("Flagstone"), through its principal Lawrence "Larry" Heath ("Heath") (collectively "Flagstone/Heath" or "buyer") entered into a Buy/Sell Agreement with Defendant Rocky Mountain Timberlands, LLC, and its principals Wayne and Justin Joyner (collectively "RMT/Joyner" or "seller") in May o
More

FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER

Pursuant to Fed. Civ. P. 16 and L.R. 16.4, the parties hereby submit this Final Pretrial Order:

I. Nature of the Action

Plaintiff Flagstone Development ("Flagstone"), through its principal Lawrence "Larry" Heath ("Heath") (collectively "Flagstone/Heath" or "buyer") entered into a Buy/Sell Agreement with Defendant Rocky Mountain Timberlands, LLC, and its principals Wayne and Justin Joyner (collectively "RMT/Joyner" or "seller") in May of 2007 to purchase approximately 13,000 acres of real property in Musselshell County. The Seller was contractually obligated to assist Flagstone in subdividing the property so that it could be developed. Flagstone claims to be damaged by RMT's breach of the contract during a time that they were supposed to be acting as joint developers of the subject property. RMT previously asserted that its conduct was justified because the contract was abandoned. The jury in Phase One of this trial rejected that argument. This trial is to determine whether RMT breached the Buy/Sell Agreement.

II. Jurisdiction and Venue.

The basis for jurisdiction and venue in this District Court is diversity jurisdiction under Title 28, U.S.C. § 1332, because the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 and Plaintiffs and Defendants are citizens of different states. Venue is proper in the Billings Division as the land in question is located in Musselshell County.

III. Jury or Non Jury

Both parties have demanded a jury trial.

IV. Agreed Facts

1. Appellant Flagstone Development ("Flagstone"), through its principal Lawrence "Larry" Heath ("Heath") (collectively "Flagstone/Heath" or "buyer") entered into a Buy/Sell Agreement with defendant Rocky Mountain Timberlands, LLC through its principals Wayne and Justin Joyner (collectively "RMT/Joyner" or "seller") in May of 2007 to purchase approximately 13,000 acres of real property in Musselshell County (the "Transaction"). 2. The Parties agree that Exhibit 1 is the Buy/Sell Agreement. 3. American Title & Escrow ("AT&E") was the escrow company selected to close the Transaction and to hold the development funds that Flagstone/Heath was contractually obligated to contribute the co-development. 4. Before the Transaction closed, RMT/Joyner caused the property to be sold to a new buyer Nicolas Powers ("Powers").

V. Elements of Liability

The Court has determined that the only issue to be litigated in this phase of the trial is RMT's liability for breach of contract. The elements of a claim for breach of contract are as follows:

Count 1: Breach of Contract

1) Existence of a contract (Exhibit 1) 2) Breach of a material term of the contract 3) Damages

The existence of a contract is stipulated. This phase of the trial is to determine whether RMT breached a material term of the contract. Plaintiff contends at this phase of the trial that each and all of the actions below constitute breach of the Buy/Sell Agreement:

— Breach of the seller's obligation to put the subject property through subdivision process using the regulations of the State of Montana and Musselshell County in 20+ acre parcels. — Secretly working to undermine the "mutually determined" subdivision layout as required by the terms of Exhibit 1. — Breach of the obligation to construct roads by the Seller's in-house contractor in an amount not to exceed $35,000.00 per mile. — Failure to provide a 10 day notice to cure under the terms of the contract in lieu of the Notice of Termination (Exhibit 2). — Interfering with Heath's contractual obligation to obtain financing. — Secretly selling the Property to Powers while under contract on the same land with Flagstone. Evidence of such sale and concealment included the following • Instructing American Title's Jen Smith to conceal from Flagstone the sale of 30 Mile Ranch to third party Powers, and agreeing to indemnify American Title from damages therefrom; • Justin Joyner and Wayne Marchwick's decision to "give Mr. Heath the impression that all is well and keep him satisfied with limited contact." • Misleading Flagstone into believing that RMT was moving forward with the subdivision application; • Sending a false "Termination Notice" purporting to terminate the Buy/Sell for the failure to pay subdivision filing fees when no such plat application had ever been submitted; • Failing to obtain "Release of the Heath Contract" as required by the Powers Buy Sell Agreement.

VI. Relief Sought

1. A finding of breach of contract by the jury.

VII. Legal Issues

Plaintiff objected to the bifurcation of liability and damages, dismissal of Wayne and Justin Joyner and dismissal of tort claims and reserves all rights associated with those claims as set forth in the Second Amended Complaint and prior briefing.

VIII. Dismissals

For purposes of the trial in this matter, the following parties have been dismissed:

1. Larry Heath; 2. Wayne Joyner; 3. Justin Joyner; 4. Wayne Marchwick; 5. Jennifer Smith; 6. American Title and Escrow, a Montana corporation; 7. First American Title Company, a California corporation; 8. Developer Finance Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation; 9. Nicolas Powers, III, aka Nicholas D. Powers; 10. Jake Korell; Landmark of Billings, Inc., a Montana corporation; 11. Jon Ussin; U Bar S Real Estate, a Montana corporation.

IX. Use of Discovery Documents (Including Testimony from Phase 1)

Except as set forth in the excerpts of deposition and on the exhibit list, the parties do not anticipate using any further discovery documents except for impeachment. Plaintiff reserves the right to use the trial testimony of Wayne Joyner and Jen Smith and the deposition testimony of Justin Joyner and Jen Smith if they cannot be produced for trial.

In exchange for a mutual promise to produce Wayne Joyner and Larry Heath for all phases of trial, the parties shall use their respective depositions for impeachment and not in their cases in chief. Should the parties fail to appear, the opposing party may introduce evidence through depositions or prior trial testimony of the non-appearing party.

X. Estimate of Trial Time

Plaintiff bears the burden of proof as to liability for breach of contract.

1. Plaintiff estimates 2 trial days for its case-in-chief.

2. Defendant estimates 1 trial day for their case-in-chief.

XI. Supersession.

This Order supersedes the pleadings in this matter.

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS-WILL OFFER Case Name: Flagstone v. Joyner, et al. Case Number: CV-08-100-BLG-RFC Date Exhibit Def. Date Date Date Refused/ # Description Bates# Objection Offered Reserved Admitted Withdrawn 1 Flagstone/RMT AC&B Contract dated 5196-5209 5/25/07 2 Notice of Termination RMT of Contract for 2981-2982 Default dated 4/3/08 3 Email from Joyner to RMT Heath dated 8/24/7 0071 4 Email from J.Joyner to RMT Heath dated 8/26/07 0078 5 Email from Heath to J.Joyner dated RMT 8/26/07 0082 6 Email from Joyner to RMT Heath dated 8/27/07 0279 7 Email from Heath to RMT Joyner dated 9/4/07 0379 8 Email from Heath to RMT Joyner dated 9/21/07 0555 9 Email from Heath to RMT Joyner dated 10/2/07 0596 10 Email from Joyner to RMT Heath dated 10/8/07 0871 12 Email from Joyner to RMT King dated 4/7/08 0944 13 Email from King to RMT Joyner dated 3/25/8 0986 14 Email from Marchwick to J. Joyner dated RMT 3/8/08 0994 16 Email from Marchwick to Griffith, et al dated RMT 3/12/08 0998 18 Email from Marchwick to Griffith, et al. dated RMT 1/31/08 1057 19 Email from J. Joyner to King, et al dated RMT 1/15/08 1075 20 Email from Marchwick to Joyners dated RMT 1/15/08 1082 21 Email from W. Joyner RMT to J. Joyner, et al. 1092 dated 1/14/08 23 Email from W. Joyner to Griffith et al dated RMT 12/11/07 1112 24 Email from W. Joyner to Griffith, et al. dated RMT 12/6/07 1117 25 Email from Marchwick to Joyner, et al dated RMT 12/3/07 1130 26 Email from Cossitt to W. Joyner, et al dated RMT 11/28/07 1139 27 Email from W. Joyner to Cossitt, et al. dated RMT 11/27/07 1140 28 Email from Joyner to RMT King dated 5/21/07 1345 29 Email from Joyner to Thurston dated RMT 1/15/08 1085 30 Email from Smith to RMT Joyner dated 3/20/08 1937 31 Email from Joyner to Tollefson dated RMT 10/15/07 2245 32 Email from Joyner to RMT Berry dated 10/23/07 2248 33 Email from Joyner to Marchwick dated RMT 10/24/07 2251 34 Email from Joyner to RMT King dated 11/30/07 2295 35 Email from Joyner to RMT King dated 11/27 /07 2297 40 Email from J. Joyner to Spray dated RMT 1/15/08 2481 42 Email from J. Joyner to O'Neil dated RMT 1/8/08 2492 43 Email from J. Joyner to Griffith, et al dated RMT 12/11/08 3347 44 Letter from Marchwick to Mang RMT dated 12/19/07 3678 45 Email from J. Joyner to W. Joyner dated RMT 2/9/09 4986 46 Email from J. Joyner RMT to King dated 5104 11/10/08 47 Email from W. Joyner to Heath dated AC&B 9/20/07 1780 48 Email String from W.Joyner to Heath AC&B dated 9/20/07 1825 49 Email from W. Joyner to Heath dated AG&B 9/20/07 1828 50 Email from Joyner to AC&B Heath dated 9/22/07 1923 51 Email from W. Joyner to Heath dated AC&B 9/23/07 1925 52 Email from Joyner to AC&B Heath dated 9/23/07 1938 53 Email from Joyner to AC&B Heath dated 10/01/07 2077 54 Email from Joyner to AC&B Heath dated 10/01/07 2079 55 Email from Heath to Joyner dated AC&B 10/01/07 2081 56 Email from Joyner to AC&B Heath dated 10/3/07 2124 57 Email from Joyner to AC&B Heath dated 10/08/07 2230 58 Email from Heath to AC&B King dated 12/11/07 3567 RMT 60 Powers Buy/Sell 1929-1934 (Executed) 64 Email from Heath to Tollefson dated AC&B 4/2/08 4683 65 Email from Marchwick AC&B to Heath dated 4/7/08 4740 66 Email from Marchwick AC&B to Heath dated 4/8/08 4794 69 Email from J. Joyner to King et al dated RMT 3/24/08 1898 70 Cash Flow Model 30 0024-0027 Foundation Mile Ranch 72 Email from Heath to AC&B Smith dated 12/14/07 3608 AC&B 73 Email from Joyner to 8764-8765 Smith dated 2/12/08 74 Email from Smith to AC&B Joyner dated 3/31/08 8854 AC&B 75 Powers Buy Sell 9040-9314 Agreement 76 Indemnity Agreement AC&B 9313-9314 77 Email String from Jen AC&B Smith dated 4/4/08 12954-12961 81 Email from Smith to AC&B Karell dated 4/3/08 8549 83 Email from Marchwick AC&B to Heath dated 1/9/08 3762 84 Email from Joyner to AC&B Objection Heath dated 9/2007 1807 801 85 Email from Heath to AC&B Joyner dated 2/9/08 4077 88 CAD Maps and Boards 3131A 31350 3038A 3053A 3059A 90 Email from Darwin to AC&B Puccio dated 1/9/08 3761 92 Email from King to Heath dated AC&B Objection 92 12/11/2007 3566 801 101 Email from Heath to AC&B Objection Joyner dated 8/26/07 898 801 102 Email from Tollefson AC&B Objection to Heath dated 9/1/07 1086 801 106 Email from Heath to Joyner dated 9/8/07 2331A 110 Emails beginning January 21, 2008 111 Email From Wayne Joyner to Jeff King RMT dated October 3, 2007 2242 No objection 114 Email from Wayne Joyner to Jeff King RMT dated June 25, 2007 2207 No objection 115 Email from Wayne Joyner to Jeff King RMT dated May 21, 2007 1345 No objection 116 Email from Justin Joyner to Jeff King dated November 10, RMT 2008 5104 No objection 117 Email from Justin Joyner to Jeff King RMT dated November 10, 5106 No objection 2008 118 Email from Wayne Joyner to Jim Thurston dated AC&B January 15, 2008 11994 No objection 119 Email string to/from Wayne Joyner and Jeff King dated April 7, AC&B 2008 11964 No objection 120 Email string to/from Wayne Joyner and Jeff King dated April 9, AC&B 2008 11958 No objection 121 Email from Jeff King to Justin Joyner dated AC&B March 14, 2008 11954 No objection 122 Email string to/from Wayne Joyner and Jeff King dated March 10, AC&B 2008 11953 No objection 123 Email string to/from Wayne Joyner and Jeff King dated June 21, AC&B 2007 11912 No objection 124 Email from Larry Heath to Jeff King dated December 6, AC&B 2007 11982 No objection 125 Email string to/from Alanah Griffith and Wayne and Justin Joyner dated AC&B Objection November 2, 2007 11885-86 801 127 Email string to/from Wayne Joyner and Jeff King dated May 31, AC&B 2007 11881 No objection 128 Email from Wayne Objection parol Joyner to Jeff King AC&B evidence dated May 23, 2007 11867 rule 129 Email from Larry Heath to Jeff King AC&B dated January 4, 2008 11817 No objection 132 Email from Larry Heath to Wayne M Objection dated March 28, 2008 801 133 Email from Larry Heath to Jen Smith Objection 133 dated April 4, 2008 801 134 Email string to/from Objection Larry Heath and 801 Wayne Marchwick dated April 7, 2008 AC&B 30 Mile Investment 5914-5934 Objection 136 Prospectus 401,801 Email from Heath to Joyner dated October AC&B Objection 137 2,2007 2086 401,801 Email from Larry Heath to Jen Smith AC&B Objection 138 dated April 7, 2008 4727 801 Email from Heath to Joyner dated August RMT 139 24,2007 0071 No objection Email String to/from Heath and Wayne and Justin Joyner datd RMT 140 August 25, 2007 0075-79 No objection Email from Heath to Joyner dated August RMT 142 26,2007 0082 No objection PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS LIST-WILL CALL Case Name: Flagstone v. Joyner, et al. Case CV-08-100-BLG-RFC Number: City& Manner of Expert? Depa. Excerpt/ Number Name State Presentation Rep. Date Summary Objections 1 Wayne Bozeman, MT In Person Joyner 2 Larry Heath Billings, MT In Person 3 Justin Bozeman, MT In Person Joyner 4 Rick Sidwell Billings, MT In Person 5 Jennifer Billings, MT In person; P:L-P:L Smith unless 9:12-9:18 unavailable then 10:24-11:8 by video 21:2-21:4 deposition as 78-11-91:22 follows 92:16-94:12 96:4-100:6 112:4-114:4 (112-137): 114:12-117:14 Relevance; 118:17-119:6 constitutes 125:2-129:6 mention of 129:23-131:6 Insurance 133:20-134:12 137:10-137:23 153:25-158:7 159:14-160:21 Hearsay; speculative 170:1-171:6 Prejudicial and confusing 172:19-173:20 Relevance 174:21-175:2

DEFENDANTS' EXHIBIT LIST-WILL OFFER (except where indicated)

Case Name: Flagstone Development, LLC v. Joyner, et al. Case No.: CV 08-100-BLG-SEH No. Description Plaintiff's Date Date Date Date Objection Offered Admitted Refused Reserved 501 E-mail from Jeff King to Larry Heath, dated May 31, 2007 502 E-mail from Jeff King to Larry Heath, dated August 27, 2007 503 E-mail from Jeff King to Larry Heath, dated October 16, 2007 504 E-mail from Larry Heath to Jennifer Smith, dated April 4, 2008 505 E-mail from Larry Heath to Wayne M., dated March 3, 2008 506 E-mail from Larry Heath to Bryan Hall, dated April 2, 2008 Ev. Rule 408/ Relevance 507 E-mail from Lee Hanley to Larry Heath, dated March 31, 2008 Ev. Rule 408/ Relevance 508 E-mail from William Cleverly to Larry Heath, dated April 1, Ev. Rule 408/ 2008 Relevance 509 Correspondence from Gregory McGill, dated January 31, 2008 510 Article, '30-Mile' subdivision to impact Shepherd School 511 Correspondence from Alanah Griffith to Gregory McGill, dated April 3, 2008 512 Settlement Statement 513 30 Mile Ranch Investment Prospectus (offered for a limited purpose) 514 E-mail from Wayne M. to Larry Heath, dated February 15, 2008 516 Correspondence from Gregory McGill to Alanah Griffith, dated Ev. Rule 408/ February 23, 2009 Relevance 517 E-mail from Larry Heath to Jennifer Smith, dated April 4, 2008 518 E-mail from Larry Heath to Greg McGill, dated January 22, 2008 519 E-mail from Larry Heath to Jeff King, dated February 13, 2008 Ev. Rule 408/ Relevance 520 E-mail from Wayne M. to Larry Heath, dated March 9, 2008 521 E-mail from Wayne M. to Larry Heath, dated March 3, 2008 Hearsay 522 E-mail from Larry Heath to Wayne Joyner, dated August 28, 2007 523 E-mail from Larry Heath to Sidwell Land, dated October 29, 2007 524 E-mail from Hans Stoll to Larry Heath, dated November 6, 2007 525 E-mail from Larry Heath 526 E-mail from Wayne M. to Larry Heath, dated March 3, 2008 Hearsay 527 E-mail from Wayne M. to Larry Heath, dated March 28, 2008 Hearsay 528 E-mail from Wayne M. to Larry Heath, dated April 7, 2008 Hearsay

DEFENDANTS' WITNESS LIST-WILL CALL

Case Name: Flagstone Development, LLC v. Joyner, et al. Case No.: CV 08-100-BLG-SEH No. Description City/State Manner of Presentation Expert?/ Excerpts Objections Report Date 1 Wayne Joyner Bozeman, MT in person no none 2 Justin Joyner Bozeman, MT in person no none 3

DEFENDANTS' WITNESS LIST-MAY CALL

Case Name: Flagstone Development, LLC v. Joyner, et al. Case No.: CV 08-100-BLG-SEH No. Description City/State Manner of Presentation Expert?/ Excerpts Objections Report Date 1 Jake Korell Billings, MT in person no none 2 Jon Ussin Billings, MT in person no none 3 Jeff King Williamstown, MA no none 4 Jennifer Smith Billings, MT in person no none
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer