Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Marchinek v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, CV 17-70-BLG-SPW. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20180220h92
Filed: Feb. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's Findings and Recommendations filed on January 26, 2018. (Doc. 32). Judge Cavan recommends that this Court grant in part and deny in part Safeco's motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 19). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the parties were required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of Judge Cavan's Findings and
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's Findings and Recommendations filed on January 26, 2018. (Doc. 32). Judge Cavan recommends that this Court grant in part and deny in part Safeco's motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 19).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties were required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendations, this Court does not find that Judge Cavan committed clear error.

IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by United States Magistrate Judge Cavan (Doc. 32) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Safeco's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19) is granted with respect to count 1 of the complaint (Doc. 15). Count 1 is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Safeco's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19) is denied with respect to count 2 of the complaint (Doc. 15).

IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that the case is stayed pending resolution of the appraisal process.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer