Generon IGS, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, CV 18-31-BLG-TJC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20180403b79
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is plaintiff Generon IGS, Inc.'s ("Generon") Motion for Remand, seeking remand to the Montana Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Musselshell County. (Doc. 6.) Defendant Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company ("C&F") responded to Generon's motion on March 6, 2018, and indicated that it does not oppose the motion for remand to state court. (Doc. 9 at 2.) However, C&F reserved its right to seek federal jurisdiction in the future
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is plaintiff Generon IGS, Inc.'s ("Generon") Motion for Remand, seeking remand to the Montana Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Musselshell County. (Doc. 6.) Defendant Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company ("C&F") responded to Generon's motion on March 6, 2018, and indicated that it does not oppose the motion for remand to state court. (Doc. 9 at 2.) However, C&F reserved its right to seek federal jurisdiction in the future ..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff Generon IGS, Inc.'s ("Generon") Motion for Remand, seeking remand to the Montana Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Musselshell County. (Doc. 6.) Defendant Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company ("C&F") responded to Generon's motion on March 6, 2018, and indicated that it does not oppose the motion for remand to state court. (Doc. 9 at 2.) However, C&F reserved its right to seek federal jurisdiction in the future "[s]hould additional facts be discovered which support diversity jurisdiction." (Id.) Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Generon's motion is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Montana Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Musselshell County, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). This Order shall be without prejudice to any bases for federal jurisdiction that may arise from future discovery.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that C&F's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order (Doc. 13) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
