Anderson v. Mountain View Pizza Co., CV 18-58-BLG-SPW-TJC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20180702a93
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER STRIKING FILING TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs have filed a document styled as a Motion for Disclosure of Plaintiffs' Initial Disclosures. (Doc. 37.) Upon review of the filing, however, it appears that Plaintiffs have filed their Rule 26 Initial Disclosures, and are not in fact, seeking any relief from the Court. Local Rule 26.1(c) states that "Initial disclosures may not be filed." L.R. 26.1(c). Further Local Rule 26.2 provides that initial disclosures and other dis
Summary: ORDER STRIKING FILING TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs have filed a document styled as a Motion for Disclosure of Plaintiffs' Initial Disclosures. (Doc. 37.) Upon review of the filing, however, it appears that Plaintiffs have filed their Rule 26 Initial Disclosures, and are not in fact, seeking any relief from the Court. Local Rule 26.1(c) states that "Initial disclosures may not be filed." L.R. 26.1(c). Further Local Rule 26.2 provides that initial disclosures and other disc..
More
ORDER STRIKING FILING
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a document styled as a Motion for Disclosure of Plaintiffs' Initial Disclosures. (Doc. 37.) Upon review of the filing, however, it appears that Plaintiffs have filed their Rule 26 Initial Disclosures, and are not in fact, seeking any relief from the Court. Local Rule 26.1(c) states that "Initial disclosures may not be filed." L.R. 26.1(c). Further Local Rule 26.2 provides that initial disclosures and other discovery, are not to be routinely filed, unless a motion is filed relating to discovery, and the documents are relevant to the motion. L.R. 26.2 (a)-(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures filed as Doc. 37 shall be STRICKEN from the record.
Source: Leagle
