Eggar v. Berryhill, CV 17-161-BLG-SPW-TJC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20180806417
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . Based on the parties' Stipulated Motion to Remand (Doc. 17), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will 1) reconsider claimant's impairments at step two; 2) reconsider the medical opinion evidence; 3) as necessary, reconsider the residual functional capacity; 4) continue through the se
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . Based on the parties' Stipulated Motion to Remand (Doc. 17), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will 1) reconsider claimant's impairments at step two; 2) reconsider the medical opinion evidence; 3) as necessary, reconsider the residual functional capacity; 4) continue through the seq..
More
ORDER
SUSAN P. WATTERS, District Judge.
Based on the parties' Stipulated Motion to Remand (Doc. 17),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will 1) reconsider claimant's impairments at step two; 2) reconsider the medical opinion evidence; 3) as necessary, reconsider the residual functional capacity; 4) continue through the sequential evaluation process, to include obtaining additional vocational expert testimony, as necessary; and 5) issue a new decision.
Upon proper application, Plaintiff shall be eligible for attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 24 U.S.C. § 2412 et seq.
Source: Leagle
