Native Ecosystems Council v. Raby, CV 18-157-BLG-SPW-TJC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20190419j01
Visitors: 27
Filed: Apr. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2019
Summary: SCHEDULING ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . The Court has reviewed the parties' proposed Joint Case Management Plan (Doc. 12) and hereby enters the following order governing the dispositive briefing in this matter: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and brief in support (limited to 6,500 words): June 21, 2019 Federal Defendants' brief in support of their combined cross-motion for summary judgment and response to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (l
Summary: SCHEDULING ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . The Court has reviewed the parties' proposed Joint Case Management Plan (Doc. 12) and hereby enters the following order governing the dispositive briefing in this matter: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and brief in support (limited to 6,500 words): June 21, 2019 Federal Defendants' brief in support of their combined cross-motion for summary judgment and response to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (li..
More
SCHEDULING ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN, Magistrate Judge.
The Court has reviewed the parties' proposed Joint Case Management Plan (Doc. 12) and hereby enters the following order governing the dispositive briefing in this matter:
Plaintiff's motion for summary
judgment and brief in support
(limited to 6,500 words): June 21, 2019
Federal Defendants' brief in support
of their combined cross-motion for
summary judgment and response to
Plaintiffs' motion for summary
judgment (limited to 6,500 words): August 9, 2019
Plaintiff's combined brief in response to
Federal Defendants' cross-motion for
summary judgment and reply in support
of their motion for summary judgment
(limited to 3,250 words): September 13, 2019
Federal Defendants' reply in support of
their cross-motion for summary judgment
(limited to 3,250 words): October 18, 2019
The parties may submit a request to file an oversized brief, but will be required to show good cause why the length limitations in L.R. 7.1(d)(2) are not adequate.
Source: Leagle
