Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Good v. Skifstad, CV-18-80-BU-BMM. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20190419j04 Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER BRIAN MORRIS , District Judge . Plaintiff Brent Good filed a Motion in Limine on February 6, 2019. (Doc. 14.) Defendant Donavan Skiftstad filed his response on February 20, 2019. (Doc. 29.) The Court conducted a hearing on the instant motion on April 17, 2019. (Doc. 43.) Skiftstad was represented via video by Jesse Myers. Id. Good was represented by Drew Blewett. Id. During the hearing, Myers referenced the case of Sperry v. Montana State University, 239 Mont. 251, 778 P.2d 89
More

ORDER

Plaintiff Brent Good filed a Motion in Limine on February 6, 2019. (Doc. 14.) Defendant Donavan Skiftstad filed his response on February 20, 2019. (Doc. 29.) The Court conducted a hearing on the instant motion on April 17, 2019. (Doc. 43.) Skiftstad was represented via video by Jesse Myers. Id. Good was represented by Drew Blewett. Id.

During the hearing, Myers referenced the case of Sperry v. Montana State University, 239 Mont. 251, 778 P.2d 895 (1989), in support of the definition of "release" as used in Montana Code Annotated § 27-1-703. Neither party had referenced Sperry in their initial briefing related to the motion in limine.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Good and Skifstad shall file supplemental briefing on whether the term "release" as defined by the Montana Supreme Court in Sperry proves applicable to the term release as used in Montana Code Annotated § 27-1-703. Each party's supplemental brief shall be due on or before April 25, 2019 and shall not exceed 1,000 words.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer