U.S. v. Winchell, CR 18-163-BLG-SPW. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20190515904
Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . Before the Court is Winchell's First Motion in Limine wherein he requests the Court to exclude evidence of his alleged prior criminal conduct. (Doc. 24). In its response, the United States represents that it does not intend to introduce his prior criminal conduct unless the defendant opens the door to the content or unless it is admitted properly pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). With this stipulation in mind, the Court GRANTS Winchell's motion. (Do
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . Before the Court is Winchell's First Motion in Limine wherein he requests the Court to exclude evidence of his alleged prior criminal conduct. (Doc. 24). In its response, the United States represents that it does not intend to introduce his prior criminal conduct unless the defendant opens the door to the content or unless it is admitted properly pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). With this stipulation in mind, the Court GRANTS Winchell's motion. (Doc..
More
ORDER
SUSAN P. WATTERS, District Judge.
Before the Court is Winchell's First Motion in Limine wherein he requests the Court to exclude evidence of his alleged prior criminal conduct. (Doc. 24). In its response, the United States represents that it does not intend to introduce his prior criminal conduct unless the defendant opens the door to the content or unless it is admitted properly pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). With this stipulation in mind, the Court GRANTS Winchell's motion. (Doc. 24).
Source: Leagle
