Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Martindale v. Rees, CV 18-00095-H-BMM-JTJ. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20190523c31 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN JOHNSTON , Magistrate Judge . Mail sent by the Court to Plaintiff Michael Martindale on February 12, 2019 and February 27, 2019 was returned as undeliverable with an indication that Mr. Martindale was no longer incarcerated at Montana State Prison. (Docs. 16, 18.) The Montana Department of Corrections website indicates that Mr. Martindale has been paroled and the Clerk of Court forwarded these mailings to Mr. Martindale in
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Mail sent by the Court to Plaintiff Michael Martindale on February 12, 2019 and February 27, 2019 was returned as undeliverable with an indication that Mr. Martindale was no longer incarcerated at Montana State Prison. (Docs. 16, 18.) The Montana Department of Corrections website indicates that Mr. Martindale has been paroled and the Clerk of Court forwarded these mailings to Mr. Martindale in care of Missoula Probation and Parole.

The Local Rules for the District of Montana provide:

(b) Dismissal Due to Failure to Notify. The court may dismiss a complaint without prejudice or strike an answer when: (1) a document directed to the attorney or self-represented party by the court has been returned to the court as not deliverable; and (2) the court fails to receive within 60 days of this return a written communication from the attorney or self-represented party indicating a current address for service.

L.R. 5.3(b).

Mr. Martindale was advised in the Court's September 27, 2018 Notice of Case Opening (Doc. 3 at 2), the Court's Order dated October 24, 2018 (Doc. 5 at 5), and the Court's January 9, 2019 Scheduling Order (Doc. 13 at 9) that he must immediately inform the Clerk of Court of any change in his address and a failure to do so could result in dismissal of his case. It has been more than 60 days since the return of written communication from the Court addressed to Mr. Martindale's address of record and Mr. Martindale has not filed a notice of change of address.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to L.R. 5.3(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Mr. Martindale at his address of record and in care of Missoula Probation and Parole.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT TO FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO OBJECT

Mr. Martindale may file objections to these Findings and Recommendations within fourteen (14) days after service (mailing) hereof.1 28 U.S.C. § 636. Failure to timely file written objections may bar a de novo determination by the district judge and/or waive the right to appeal.

This order is not immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 4(a), should not be filed until entry of the District Court's final judgment. served by mail, he is entitled an additional three (3) days after the period would otherwise expire.

FootNotes


1. Rule 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that "[w]hen a party may or must act within a specified time after being served and service is made under Rule 5(b)(2)(C) (mail) . . . 3 days are added after the period would otherwise expire under Rule 6(a)." Therefore, since Mr. Martindale is being
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer