Filed: Aug. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2019
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN JOHNSTON , Magistrate Judge . I. Synopsis Defendant Elwood G. Hall (Hall) has been accused of violating the conditions of his supervised release. Hall admitted all of the alleged violations, except one. Hall's supervised release should be revoked. Hall should be placed in custody for 6 months, with 30 months of supervised release to follow. The Court should consider an early termination of Hall's supervised release if he successfully completes his sex offe
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN JOHNSTON , Magistrate Judge . I. Synopsis Defendant Elwood G. Hall (Hall) has been accused of violating the conditions of his supervised release. Hall admitted all of the alleged violations, except one. Hall's supervised release should be revoked. Hall should be placed in custody for 6 months, with 30 months of supervised release to follow. The Court should consider an early termination of Hall's supervised release if he successfully completes his sex offen..
More
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
JOHN JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge.
I. Synopsis
Defendant Elwood G. Hall (Hall) has been accused of violating the conditions of his supervised release. Hall admitted all of the alleged violations, except one. Hall's supervised release should be revoked. Hall should be placed in custody for 6 months, with 30 months of supervised release to follow. The Court should consider an early termination of Hall's supervised release if he successfully completes his sex offender treatment program while on supervised release.
II. Status
Hall pleaded guilty to escape in 1990. The Court sentenced Hall to 30 months of custody, followed by 60 months of supervised release on June 20, 1990. (Doc. 56 in Cause CV 90-17-GF-BMM). The Court ordered that the sentence run concurrent with Hall's sentence in Cause CV 90-17-GF-BMM. Id. Hall's current term of supervised release began on June 18, 2019. (Doc. 47 at 2).
Petition
The United States Probation Office filed a Petition on August 7, 2019, requesting that the Court revoke Hall's supervised release. (Doc. 47). The Petition alleges that Hall violated the conditions of his supervised release: 1) by using methamphetamine on two separate occasions; 2) by consuming alcohol; 3) by failing to report for substance abuse testing; 4) by failing to notify his probation officer of a change in residence; and 5) by failing to report for substance abuse treatment. (Doc. 47 at 2-3). United States District Judge Brian Morris issued a warrant for Hall's arrest on August 9, 2019. (Doc. 47).
Initial appearance
Hall appeared before the undersigned for his initial appearance on August 13, 2019. Hall was represented by counsel. Hall stated that he had read the petition and that he understood the allegations. Hall waived his right to a preliminary hearing. The parties consented to proceed with the revocation hearing before the undersigned.
Revocation hearing
The Court conducted a joint revocation hearing in this case and in Cause CR 90-17-GF-BMM on August 13, 2019. Hall admitted that he had violated the conditions of his supervised release: 1) by using methamphetamine on two separate occasions; 2) by consuming alcohol; 3) by failing to report for substance abuse testing; and 4) by failing to report for substance abuse treatment. The government did not attempt to prove alleged violation 5. The violations that Hall admitted are serious and warrant revocation of Hall's supervised release.
Hall's violations are Grade C violations. Hall's criminal history category is IV. Hall's underlying offense is a Class B felony. Hall could be incarcerated for up to 24 months. He could be ordered to remain on supervised release for up to 36 months, less any custody time imposed. The United States Sentencing Guidelines call for a term of custody of 6 to 12 months.
III. Analysis
Hall's supervised release should be revoked. Hall should be incarcerated for 6 months, with 30 months of supervised release to follow. The Court should consider an early termination of Hall's supervised release if he successfully completes his sex offender treatment program while on supervised release. This sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary.
IV. Conclusion
The Court informed Hall that the above sentence would be recommended to Judge Morris. The Court also informed Hall of his right to object to these Findings and Recommendations within 14 days of their issuance. The Court explained to Hall that Judge Morris would consider a timely objection before making a final determination on whether to revoke his supervised release and what, if any, sanction to impose.
The Court FINDS:
That Elwood G. Hall violated the conditions of his supervised release by using methamphetamine, by consuming alcohol, by failing to report for substance abuse testing, and by failing to report for substance abuse treatment.
The Court RECOMMENDS:
That the District Court should revoke Hall's supervised release and commit Hall to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons for 6 months, with 30 months of supervised release to follow. The Court should consider an early termination of Hall's supervised release if he successfully completes his sex offender treatment program while on supervised release. The sentence imposed in this case should run concurrent with the sentence imposed in Cause CR 90-17-GF-BMM.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO OBJECT
The parties may serve and file written objections to the Findings and Recommendations within 14 days of their entry, as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A district judge will make a de novo determination regarding any portion of the Findings and Recommendations to which objection is made. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the Findings and Recommendations. Failure to timely file written objections may bar a de novo determination by the district judge, and may waive the right to appear and allocute before a district judge.
